
How many more times does Anwar need to be stabbed?
Trust is not a worthy word given that family and close friends play each other out for financial gain or for power etc.
Everybody encounter it once or couple of times in their life.
But Anwar has the worst encounter not once but twice.
And the person who helped make this happens is Azmin.
Azmin has always being grateful to Mahathir for giving financial assistance to study, work and now a beautiful standing as Minister in Economic which he knows nuts.
So with the backing of Mahathir and Daim with fund of US16.91 billion which was stolen and transferred out of Malaysia recently what has Azmin Ali got to lose.
Win or lose, Mahathir is still the PM and his position as Minister is secure while the money is there to swim in.
AZMIN ALI IS DEFINITELY GOING TO CHALLENGE DSAI FOR THE TOP POST IN PKR.
Who is the Jinx?
Within 100 days already there are two death.

That’s Not The Way Share Market Works
Encik Shahril of Sapura Energy had to defend his total take-home package of around RM70m a year for the past few years. Specifically since FY 2014.
His defense was that there was a covenant. If he won’t sell his shares, the company would get better interest rates on loans. Seemingly to imply that some major lenders will only lend to Sapura Energy only if he stayed.
Errr, that’s not the way a share market works. The remuneration committee cannot and should not take into account whatever “covenant” with lenders intimated with the CEO. It is like saying I am the CEO and I had to sell my mother’s house so that I don’t have to sell my shares in the company, so that share price doesn’t collapse and the lenders only wanted to deal with me as CEO. That’s not the way a share market works… I think.
Are you telling me that all 1,000 banks in Asia would not lend to you unless you stay as CEO and do not sell your shares? Even if that was the case, was the RM50-80m a year from FY2014 to compensate you for “opportunity cost” and “losses”? Who compensates the minority shareholders’ losses???? That’s not the way sharemarket works.
The remuneration committee can choose to reward the CEO if there had been reasonable stretch targets met, or even positioning the company to meet future challenges. The bottom line is that whatever you reward the CEO must have been to the benefit of ALL SHAREHOLDERS, either in new earnings achieved or price appreciation. There has been none of that.
You can try to argue that the CEO has positioned the company to face the new market conditions and restrategize the company’s direction over the last few years. Hence all shareholders will benefit from that. Again, while that is all good, IT MUST BE REFLECTED IN EARNINGS and PRICE APPRECIATION. If the positioning is so good for long term, then give la bonus WHEN these long-term strategies pan out. NOT BEFORE THAT.
The market cap of Sapura Energy has been between RM3.3bn to RM4.5bn over the last 12 months. At RM80m a year, that means the CEO gets approximately 1% to 2% of total market cap of the company a year. If the company continues to lose money, or even break even for 10 years… it means the CEO would have gotten between 10% to 20% of the market cap of the company for not doing terribly well.
Mind you Encik Shahril owns just 16%, which translates to a value of RM520m to RM720m. Now put that in perspective, RM70m-RM80m in compensation a year is a bit much.
That’s certainly not how the share market works. I think.
(above is a copy of the remuneration framework of a good listed company … in this case, it was Apple Inc.)
It is not just at Sapura Energy. Just go and examine the total board compensation, in particular to the CEO, of the following companies. The board remuneration is totally out of whack with whatever business metrics you want to use to measure good or great performance:
Genting
KNM
Salcon
Maybank
IHH Healthcare
IOI
Maxis
TA Enterprise
YTL
There are those who are owner controlled, which makes it difficult when they pay themselves an over the top amount. You already owned a controlling stake, if you perform well, your equity will rise. Be like Li Ka Shing, he pays himself HK5,000 dollar a year as compensation.
Asset Class Returns In The USA
The brilliant snapshot of asset class returns compiled by Blackrock makes for interesting analysis. See if you can deduce any pointers from the table. 100 persons could be looking at the same table and arrive at differing conclusions.
To develop a keen interest in investing is the continue to develop your ability to link and see cause-and-effects from seemingly disparate factors.
a) Look at 2008 when the financial crisis impacted. When all hell breaks loose, does it matter what kind of stocks you were in? Well, long and short answer, NO. Large caps core -37%, Large caps growth -38.4%, Large caps value -36.9%, Small caps -33.8%. There’s no place to hide apparently. But when big boss sneezes, the rest of the world catches a worse cold, EVEN THOUGH IT WASN’T BLOODY OUR FAULT!!! International stocks were down -43.4%. Where is the justification?
b) The following years till 2017 were all UP years, thanks to the relentless printing of money by the Federal Reserve and EU. The exception was 2011 where equities had a terrible year. When the US had a terrible year you can bet that international equities would have an even worse year. Large cap growth 2.6%, Large cap core 2.1%, Large cap value 0.4%, Small caps -4.2%… and international equities ta-dah -12.1%.
c) For those risk-averse players selecting dividend stocks, well, they performed as expected in a normal market. But when crisis hits like in 2008, it was also down -22.8%. In the difficult 2011 dividend stocks only eked out a 1.8% return.
d) Two down years out of 11 is not that bad, but it also points to the conclusion that we are ripe for another DOWN/CRISIS year soon. It comes around like clockwork because markets never forget and investors always forget, and you can quote me on this.
e) Just look at the last 5 years, these equity asset classes are just taking their sweet rotational play year in year out thanks to low-interest rates and excess liquidity due to the flagrant printing of money. There’s nothing academic about it, just kids playing with an increasing number of toys.
… we are ripe for another DOWN/CRISIS year soon. It comes around like clockwork because markets never forget and investors always forget …
Catch These Movies: THE LEAKERS & BROTHER OF THE YEAR
The Leakers – Helmed by the often brilliant Herman Yau Nai Hoi (whom I believe was from Malaysia who became a great success in HK films). 70% of the movie was shot in Georgetown.
Good story, good plot twists galore, non-stop action, even the two car chases in Penang were pretty well done. Good acting from the top 4 cast members: Julian Cheung, Charmaine Sheh, Francis Ng and Kent Cheng.
Two sons of a Malaysian pharmaceutical owner went against their father’s business practices. Reliving SARs all over again somewhat. Part Mission Impossible, put in two cops – one straight as an arrow, the other to solve crimes at all cost. Non stop action. 90/100
Brother of The Year – The Thais continue to win more Asian viewers with their non-horror genre such as Bad Genius and this comedy feature. Kind of simple story but good storyline and acting, in particular towards the last 1/3 of the movie, managed to dissect many dysfunctional brother-sister relationships. 88/100
The Tide Has Turned?
The local bourse has been drifting down for weeks now with no respite in sight. As written a few weeks back, Malaysia’s problems were not largely associated with the USA-China trade wars:
The Problems: We are in the midst of “house-cleaning”, while we are quite prepared to be patient, a few things are noteworthy. 
a) Removing of GLC CEOs and other BN appointees from important government positions – While I wholeheartedly support this, it also hampers all these affected GLCs to “move” or carry out projects. Nobody dares to negotiate contracts as the situation at the top is still fluid. This has to be managed FAST and QUICK. The longer we carry out this bloodletting, the longer the downtrend of the market will be. There is a very low-velocity number in the current velocity of money.
b) Tainted Companies – Those not in the GLCs bracket but ‘tainted’ listed companies are affected as well. Quite a number of these company owners are currently hiding in overseas waiting for the dust to settle. When the owners are not around and their fate so uncertain, these companies will do as little as possible.
c) Clean Listed Companies – They may not need to hide but since nothing is moving at the government level, it also meant the wheels of economic activity also grinds to a halt.
Our PM and the Council of Elders must put in their strategy and action plan to work fast. More so when it comes to Malaysia because our country is highly dependent on the stock market as a major catalyst for domestic economic activity. Malaysia has one of the highest percentages of GDP that is listed on the stock market (over 75% by guesstimate) – that translates to a high correlation for market activity with the real economy.
However, today saw some silver lining appearing when the Minister of Finance approves the go-ahead for LRT3 project.
http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/george-kent-mrcb-after-lrt3-set-proceed
This was very significant as instead of removing people from GLCs, we are starting to green light projects. Things needed to move. This move, in particular, was more meaningful in other ways. This project basically helmed by two “friendly counters to Najib’s administration” (one more so than the other). It may be a signal that the bloodletting is over, now let’s move on. As long as you stay the course of proper business management with no impropriety, you can be part of New Malaysia. If that’s the message, its a huge relief for plenty of listed company owners.
TIMING
The timing couldn’t have come at a better time. Let’s look at the China trips coming up for Malaysia’s top guns:
a) Finance Minister will be going to China end of the month of July
b) Tun Daim will be going a few days before Lim Guan Eng
c) PM will be going to China mid August.
Last month, it was reported that Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had said Guan Eng and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission officers will travel to China soon to discuss with relevant officials about the two gas pipeline projects under SSER. Before that, Dr Mahathir had also noted the need to renegotiate unequal terms of the controversial ECRL project.
So why do we need 3 separate trips? One can only argue about it logically since I am not inside those meeting rooms.
My theory is that Tun Daim has to go earlier than LGE to meet with “the real big guns” behind the scenes with appointments set up by Robert Kuok. Why? Because the whole shebang with China needs to be concluded positively with no hiccups.
I expect Daim and Robert to meet with people who can work the overall strategic picture. I expect the two to voice the case for Malaysia, how we have turned a corner, how we now have to grapple with a significant level of government debt and liabilities, how China can use the situation to further clamp down on “corruption” by China state firms overseas, how both countries can come up smelling like roses …
China needs Malaysia in a way to consolidate ties in Southeast Asia, not just for the One Belt One Road thing but strategically China wants a partner to have indirect oversight over the Straits of Melaka, militarily and economically.
Only with the “heads up OK” from the real bigwigs can LGE go and renegotiate better terms for the existing China-linked contracts in Malaysia.
Hence when PM goes over, it will be a rapturous ceremony to seal the beginning of a new partnership. I see palm oil buying to be a major issue which can jump start Malaysia’s major industry. Closer ties and agreements with respect to foreign exchange and mutual “support” of each others’ currencies and its usage in trade could be forthcoming.
These potential developments are important as there are still plenty of genuine projects related to One Belt One Road for Malaysia and China. It will also mean that its not a “sin” to have a China company as partner in future projects.
The tide has finally turned?
Cautiously optimistic.
Read Romelu Lukaku’s Story
I’ve Got Some Things to Say
The kitman said, “O.K., kid, what number do you want?” And I said, “Give me number 10.”
My friend said, “Playing where?”
p/s To read the rest of article, please click on link above
Anthony Loke sold our Data to China

WHY DID THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORT SELL OUR DATA TO CHINA?
AT WHAT PRICE AND FOR WHAT REASON?
IS LGE INVOLVE?
WHEN POWER COMES ONTO THE LAP SO EASILY, DOES ONE NEED TO START FILLING UP OWN POCKET?
IS THIS HOW MAHATHIR CHOOSE HIS BAIT WHO ARE CORRUPTED AT FIRST SIGHT.
Perfect timing to steal
Containing Property Prices
Many major cities are trying to contain spiraling property prices which have become unaffordable for the bulk of their own population. No need to delve too deeply into too many theories on this. The breakdown of the major factors affecting property prices as confirmed by the research paper below from BIS:
real house price growth – the perception that investors and buyers get real house price growth; i.e. returns must be higher than nominal inflation; hence the GDP growth prospects and financial balance sheet for the country must be “good-strong”
Australia’s Plate Of Worry
net migration inflows – in the 70s and 80s there were waves of migration to developed countries and that was a noted catalyst for higher prices; however from 2000 onwards we have seen the dubious flow of illicit funds from Russia and institutional flow of funds from certain countries’ pension funds in particular to the UK and other global cities; for the last 10-15 years the outflow of funds from China to certain investing hotspots have been a big factor as well; hence actual migration of people is no longer necessary as people are a lot more mobile and global in their investment portfolio
size of the existing housing stock – self-explanatory; however the more vibrant a city’s economy which will attract the better rental market, is another important supporting factor
nominal interest rates – self-explanatory
These 4 main factors may have explained much of the price growth from 70s-2000. However, there are two major factors unaccounted for, which may further explain the present stratospheric property prices:
a) the hyper-liberal ways developed nations have been printing money to get themselves out of the few financial crisis
b) the enormous wealth created in China by the middle class
“““““““““““““
Residential investment and economic activity: evidence from the past five decades
BIS Working Papers | No 726 |
06 June 2018
Contribution
Findings
Abstract
Many countries have tried to contain the price surges, from the UK, to Canada, to major cities in China, to Hongkong, to Australia and even New Zealand. Finally, I think Singapore has come up with the most brutal and (possibly most effective) policies to counter the price bubbles.
ABSD Changes (Singapore)
| AS OF JULY 5 | FROM JULY 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Singaporeans buying first residential property | 0% | 0% |
| Singaporeans buying second residential property | 7% | 12% |
| Singaporeans buying third and subsequent residential property | 10% | 15% |
| Permanent residents buying first residential property | 5% | 5% |
| Permanent residents buying second and subsequent residential property | 10% | 15% |
| Foreigners buying any residential property | 15% | 20% |
| Entities buying any residential property | 15% | 25% (plus additional 5% for developers) |
The curtailment for local investors are quite tough but the taxes on foreigners are now quite debilitating. Other countries should try the Singapore way. It is a determined way to quash sentiment.












