There’s basically no better way to describe these counters. Tainted might be least offensive word. To all investors, again many will go back to the crudest, simplest form of decision making – anchor and adjust. We anchor on what we know, and adjust for new information.
Hence something that was 3.60 before the election and now stands at 1.60 looks mighty tempting. But we also know the new paradigm will also means that to get back to the 3.60 is almost inconceivable.
Glory to the risk takers. These counters will have a lot of volatility, downs and rebounds. Rumours and newsflow will be flying like fake news in a thunderstorm of hope and lies. Day traders and prop traders will love these counters, hence beware of getting caught by them.
What Might Happen To Them
– These counters while tainted, are not like BN appointees whom you can just fire. If they are found to be in cohorts with previous government in doing “illegal activities” such as: collusion, bid rigging, over pricing, rebates, unjustified commissions, bribery, circumventing laws or approval processes, cosy monopolies, highly preferential awardment of contracts, etc. Hence construction firms, if hit, will be gravely affected owing to the large sized contracts and.or dependence on certain personalities/unit. The trouble with construction firms is that there is little in ways of differentiation. Most can do most type of construction. Unless you have specific expertise (deep tunneling etc..).. the more you will be at the mercy of the new paradigm.
– There are some counters that have a decent business model going. Even if they were tainted, the business might still be good. To that end, there will be no need to reinvent the wheel, but if the owners are not deemed as “suitable owners” going forward, one sense that these counters may be “persuaded” to sell to a GLC. However, let’s not kid ourselves, the price won’t be fair or high.
Conclusion
I will stay away from tainted counters till there is a firm hint of change in ownership. Otherwise if you must, treat them as quick punts… and be good at trading.
Category: Uncategorized
Spongebobs, Parasites & Leeches

Senior Corporate / Investment Pros / Company Owners ..
I Hate
Its funny how many times investment pros get asked to do a deal on a contingent basis – i.e. only get paid if the deal gets done. I wonder what would our parents think when we tell them that we work on a contingency basis, after they have spent their life time savings sending us to college. What is this mentality, this contingent mentality – it happens way too often in Asia, not so much in First world countries. Our brains do not matter, effort does not matter, only success??
Why the aversion from commitment fee, engagement fee, out of pocket expenses?? You go and try to get some US investment bankers on a contingency deal – they’d laugh at you. Are some people not worth a salary? When you take advantage of people like the situations cited above, you are a parasite and a leech – you suck people dry, you will not share till you’ve got your share, you will be rich though but not many will cherish your time on earth.
Another prime example of sponging off people are usually the very senior corporate people, they will “pick your brains” for ideas, insights, opinions, analysis of situations, corporate deals, business developments, industry turning points, etc.. Somehow, these people think it is absolutely OK to engage others to suck their ideas, sponge on their brain power and take credit for them. I know of so many hedge/ fund managers who will listen to your picks, buys them, make tons, and never bother to return the favour via stock orders or a call. Many senior investment pros and senior management people feel it is part of their “ability” to cultivate these various pots of honey to suck them dry occasionally to help them protect their position. Its like high school all over during the exams, and the brats are still looking over to copy your work (and doing so much better than you).
Don’t get me wrong, it is OK to exchange ideas among friends (genuine friends). It is also important to let the other person know what your motives are upfront. It is also important to have the graciousness to acknowledge your sources, and where possible, to repay them back in kind or even materially. How many of us do that? It is exactly similar to those people who will ask a doctor at a social setting about how to treat their medical condition – so what has changed that makes it OK not having to pay for professional advice, just because we are at Starbucks??
Too many investment pros and senior corporate management people regard a conversation or a Q&A session with another professional as just a conversation – while a lawyer can charge tons per hour for the same service. Don’t be a parasite or a leech, it is a pure reflection on your character, unless you are the manipulative sort of character (who would do very well in the corporate world anyway)… give proper due and recognition to professional comments, analysis, opinions… (unless they are voluntary in the form of blogs like mine). Always be upfront, “I need to hear you views on… if you don’t mind … but stop me if I am overstepping the line…” …. “Thanks, I appreciate your time, is there anyway I could repay you …” …. “Hey, I made xxx for taking your advice, I hope you will accept this US$200,000 check from me” …..
If you are a corporate parasite or an investment leech, and see nothing wrong with it cause it helps you get to where you are – cheers, and go lick your own balls cause you can (no backbone). Riches, fame and power will never compensate for lack of character, integrity and fair mindedness.
I am now branded a Bad Monster Mother

I voted for a change

Clair de Lune
If ever there was a song or a piece of music that deserves its own special posting, it has to be Clair de Lune. You cannot even call it a song as that seems to be belittling the music. Yes, it has to be called that masterpiece composition by Claude Debussy.
If you ever needed to find solace, calmness and one with the world, just listen to Clair de Lune, possibly my favourite piece of music ever, and I am sure many of you feel the same.
If ever I were to get lost on an island for years, and I can only have one piece of music… this would be it.
Listening to Clair de Lune kind of makes me feel that all people of the earth are so alike. I don’t think anyone on earth do not feel the same when they listen to this song ~ any race, any nationality, any political affiliation, any religious group, everyone ~ we all feel the same kind of wonderment and will be moved by it. Coincidence or the humanity of it all.
Translated, its called Moonlight, named after Paul Verlaine’s poem of the same name. For such a wonderful piece of music, I tried to locate the movies which have used the piece of music. To my horror and to Debussy as well, many do not do justice by parading the music alongside so-so movies with even blander plots.
Topping the list of horrors has to be using Claire de Lune in Twilight, of course. There are many movies including Ocean’s Eleven & Ocean’s Thirteen, Seven Years in Tibet, Atonement, Man On Fire, The Darjeeling Limited, Ficció, El próximo oriente, The First Day of My Life, The Right Stuff, Antonieta, Casino Royale, Gran Turismo 4, The Game, Mùi du du xanh – L’odeur de la papaye verte (aka The Scent of Green Papaya), Tôkyô Sonata, Valley of Abraham,Bloodsport 3 (OMG), Castaway, Dog Soldiers, … I must have missed some somewhere.
Movies that feature the music appropriately: Tokyo Sonata, Castaway and The Right Stuff. But the best movie has to be Frankie & Johnny, starring Al Pacino and the wonderful Michelle Pfieffer. The movie was way under-rated, the story enchanting and the acting was amazing. The song was waaayyyy appropriate. In fact, I thought the entire plot and movie was made so that they could feature the song towards the last 15 minutes of the movie.
Anthony Tobin 2007, piano solo.
The tough task here is selecting which of the four versions you like best. They are all wonderful. I think for this piece, less is more, I love David’s version best.
David Oistrakh plays beautifully, recorded in Paris, 1962, with Frida Bauer on piano.
John Williams & Julian Bream
Julian Lloyd Webber with his cello and full orchestral accompaniment.
Malaysia’s Debt – Deconstructed
Nobody is spooking anyone by revealing the level of debt the country is facing. Before we can properly address the debt, we have to be honest and come clean. No point pussyfooting here. Some said that that jolted the markets. While the stock market is an important aspect for a open trading country like Malaysia, volatility in the market cannot be minimised at the expense of the greater good. I believe most Malaysians would not mind suffering over the short term as long as the good of the country is being prioritised.
There are rules in placed where federal government’s debt-to-GDP ratio should be lower than the 55% self-imposed debt limit. If the previous government deliberately misled or went over that limit, as it appears to be so, there should be “censures” and a deliberation on possible legal consequences for the mismanagement and misinformation.
(the key is to look at the colour representing each country)
| MOF (Inc.) Majority Shareholding Companies | |
|---|---|
| # | Company |
| MAJORITY | |
| 1. | 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) |
| 2. | Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB) |
| 3. | Astronautic Technology (M) Sdn Bhd (ATSB) |
| 4. | Bank Pembangunan Malaysia Berhad |
| 5. | Bank Pertanian Malaysia (Agrobank) |
| 6. | Cradle Fund Sdn Bhd |
| 7. | Cyberview Sdn Bhd |
| 8. | Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Berhad (EXIM Bank) |
| 9. | FELCRA Berhad |
| 10. | Halal Industry Development Corporation Sdn Bhd (HDC) |
| 11. | IJN Holdings Sdn Bhd |
| 12. | Indah Water Konsortium Sdn Bhd (IWK) |
| 13. | Inno Bio Ventures Sdn Bhd (IBV) |
| 14. | Institut Terjemahan dan Buku Malaysia Bhd (ITBM) |
| 15. | Jambatan Kedua Sdn Bhd (JKSB) |
| 16. | JKP Sdn Bhd |
| 17. | Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB) |
| 18. | Khazanah Nasional Berhad |
| 19. | Kumpulan Modal Perdana Sdn Bhd (KMP) |
| 20. | Malaysia Debt Ventures Berhad (MDV) |
| 21. | Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation Sdn Bhd (MDeC) |
| 22. | Malaysia Kuwaiti Investment Corporation Sdn Bhd (MKIC) |
| 23. | Malaysia Rail Link Sdn Bhd |
| 24. | Malaysian Bioeconomy Development Corporation Sdn Bhd |
| 25. | Malaysian Venture Capital Management Bhd (MAVCAP) |
| 26. | Mass Rapid Transit Corporation Sdn Bhd (MRT) |
| 27. | MIMOS Berhad |
| 28. | MyCreative Ventures Sdn. Bhd. |
| 29. | MyHSR Corporation Sdn Bhd |
| 30. | Pembinaan BLT Sdn Bhd (PBLT) |
| 31. | Pengurusan Aset Air Berhad (PAAB) |
| 32. | Perbadanan Nasional Berhad (PNS) |
| 33. | Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) |
| 34. | Prasarana Malaysia Berhad |
| 35. | Prokhas Sdn Bhd |
| 36. | Rangkaian Hotel Seri Malaysia Sdn Bhd |
| 37. | Sarawak Hidro Sdn Bhd |
| 38. | Sepang International Circuit Sdn Bhd (SIC) |
| 39. | SIRIM Berhad |
| 40. | Small Medium Enterprise Development Bank Malaysia Berhad (SME Bank) |
| 41. | SRC International Sdn Bhd |
| 42. | Suria Strategic Energy Resources Sdn Bhd |
| 43. | Syarikat Perumahan Negara Bhd (SPNB) |
| 44. | Technology Park Malaysia Corporation Sdn Bhd (TPM) |
| 45. | UDA Holdings Bhd |
| MAJORITI – SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLE (SPV) | |
| 46. | 1Malaysia Sukuk Global Berhad |
| 47. | AES Solutions Sdn Bhd |
| 48. | Aset Tanah Nasional Bhd |
| 49. | Assets Global Network Sdn Bhd |
| 50. | DanaInfra Nasional Berhad |
| 51. | East Coast Rail Link Sdn Bhd |
| 52. | GovCo Holdings Berhad |
| 53. | K.L. International Airport Bhd (KLIAB) |
| 54. | Malaysia Development Holding Sdn Bhd |
| 55. | Malaysian Sovereign Sukuk Sdn Bhd |
| 56. | Pembinaan PFI Sdn Bhd |
| 57. | Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad |
| 58. | Perwaja Terengganu Sdn Bhd |
| 59. | Piramid Pertama Sdn Bhd |
| 60. | Pyrotechnical Managers Holding Sdn Bhd |
| 61. | SDE Solutions Sdn Bhd |
| 62. | Syarikat Jaminan Kredit Perumahan Berhad |
| 63. | Syarikat Jaminan Pembiayaan Perniagaan Berhad |
| 64. | Syarikat Tanah & Harta Sdn Bhd |
| 65. | Turus Pesawat Sdn Bhd |
| 66. | Wakala Global Sukuk Berhad |
Hold your horses till after Hari Raya

Kedah will have a new Menteri Besar

When one repeatedly put a silver spoon fed donkey as Menteri Besar, it is like telling the Rakyat to go back to their old ways.
This GE14 is about change. The change not only for a few states but as a whole nation. It takes courage and the Malays did it.
Population in Malaysia stands at 34 million.
75% are considered Bumiputra cum Malays
12% Chinese
6% Bangla
4% Indians
3% Others
Mahathir may be a World Class Leader but that does not mean his children carry the same DNA.
Kedahan loathe Mukhriz when he utter the words I AM BACK.
This is not the first time Mukhriz was the Menteri Besar of Kedah but second and already people can see the same old silver spoon fed donkey has not changed. At age 54, this donkey will remain the same as he is used to living without a brain. Mukhriz need his father Mahathir and Daim to tell him what to do. Mukhriz has not learnt his previous lessons well. Today he still surrounds himself to people who lick his backside with wide open mouths.
Is it the fate of Kedahah to have such a rascal again?
Some people think the Sultan of Kedah love Mukhriz more than its people.
I am of the opinion that if nothing is done to remove Mukhriz as Menteri Besar then do not blame UMNO, the Malays and the rest of the Rakyat when the changes take place soon.
Be prepare for PAS to take over once again.
Mahathir and Daim should understand the sentiment of Kedahan instead of securing their children’s future.
Name me one kid of Mahathir and Daim who are not spoon fed.
https://dinmerican.wordpress.com/2016/01/21/mukhriz-mahathir-the-remote-control-menteri-besar-kedah-darul-aman/
http://anotherbrickinwall.blogspot.my/2013/01/desperates-resorting-to-sabotage.html
Mustapa Mohamed coming back as Minister of International Trade and Industry

Mustapa and his associates have been invited to join Pribumi.
In return Mustapa will be named as Minister of International Trade and Industry.
I am okay with Mustapa BUT Mahathir seems to want the old foxes from UMNO to join Pribumi.
UMNO is the reason why Rakyat have come out in full force to vote them out.
Now red carpets are spread out to welcome UMNO members.
Is Pribumi not capable of recruiting new member from 34 millions citizens?
I still believe there are many in PH who should be given a chance to come up instead of giving UMNO members a second chance to continue with their dirty old ways.
My other concern is why must Mustapa associates be given advisory posts in the same Ministry and Prime Minister’s Department?
Like all Malaysians we demand for new faces and fresh blood not people from UMNO AGAIN.
Open Letter – Some Recommendations To New Government
Investing Funds
I have spoken on this in the past. We have about 1,100 listed companies and the majority are the market capitalisation of RM500m. We already have a situation whereby local pension funds are finding it tough to investable vehicles locally. Hence the need to invest an increasing amount overseas. Thats all fine. However most funds cannot invest in small caps, hence you find many decent small caps not having the support of long term funds on their register. Yes, there are plenty of under performing and even dubious small cap counters. But we are not helping matters by ignoring the small caps.
Part of the reason why so many small caps have to resort to “manipulative” share price activities to “make money” is due to a lack of genuine long term funds participating in small caps. If the situation is remedied, we can see an explosion of interest in good small caps. In the longer term, small caps will alter their behaviour to pursue good financial management goals to attract these long term funds.
We don’t even need a huge fund. EPF can allocate RM4 billion for a small caps local fund unit, targeting listed companies below RM500m market cap. Say there are 600-700 listed vehicles that qualify to be investable. Assuming 200 are “performers” .. we are talking roughly RM20m position in each. the flow on effects will be enormous. Retail investors will be better persuaded to follow “good” small caps. Small caps with a decent growth story will find it easier to seek for more capital for growth and expansion. Velocity of money will translate to a more robust small caps market. In turn, the appetite among other small caps yet unlisted, will find Bursa to be a better location to get listed. This will go a long way to losing good potential listings to other jurisdictions such as HK’s GEM.
Judiciary
AG: A most important post. A shoo-in by most would see Ambiga as a popular choice. However, the real world is not so simple. As much as we would like to see all things transparent, and all things above board. we have to be mindful that the real world involves personalities and politics. There are plenty of gray areas. While we need somebody who is respected and capable, we also need someone is able to move us gradually from gray to not to gray, and to white or shades of white. Being too idealistic may show us up as a growing nation not so prepared for the full truth. I can see somebody who is more politically astute while holding the rightful credentials assuming the post. Do we take baby steps or do we have the political will to take the plunge. Hence I would understand if Ambiga is not chosen, but I wish she will be the final choice.
EPU
Rafizi Ramli to head EPU. Enough said.
Old Habits Die Hard
Can we eradicate corruption and cronyism outright in a flash. Again, idealistically impossible. Even in the case for Hongkong, which was a grand beacon for eradicating corruption via the establishment of ICAC and the spring cleaning of the police force – eventually it took more than 5-10 years for things to take root before anti-corruption became part of the larger business culture.
To that end, to facilitate culture change: MACC must be one armed with teeth; needless to say the judiciary/AG must be free from influence; the Whistleblower Act must be revamped to protect whistleblowers. Once the machinery and laws are in place, it will permeate itself into the workings of all dealings. Full eradication will still be years away but we need to set it on the right path.
Safety Nets 1
As a caring nation, we must have some sort of unemployment benefits or unemployment insurance. As things stand, once we lose our employment, we are left to fend for ourselves. Unemployment can arise when there are structural changes to the industries a country can support. We cannot and should never be locked in a low cost exporting country.
Employer and employees can contribute a small sum to fund the Unemployment Benefits fund. Simple workable rules can be adopted from proven schemes in other countries. One should at least have worked more than 1 year to qualify and benefits if suddenly unemployed, 3 months full salary, 3 months half salary. It is important that safety nets not be a crutch but a helping hand to ease the burdens somewhat.
To that end, we must limit the number of foreign workers and start them at a higher basic pay, say RM1,500-1,800 a month. Enough about protecting our low cost production industries, or else we will never move up the economic transformation curve for higher wages and higher value add industries. No point producing graduates if the better jobs are not forthcoming.
Of course, there will be those who argue that graduates we are producing do not measure up – its a chicken and egg thing. Now that we can evolve, with a renewed perspective on education, parallel changes must be enacted across other spectrums such as industries, workforce composition and attracting the “right type of foreign investments”.
Safety Nets 2
Our bankruptcy laws are archaic, and unnecessarily favours the banks/finance companies.The trouble with our system is that bankruptcy runs in perpetuity (i.e. almost never ending till you die). Unlike in HK, Singapore and many forward thinking economies where you only have 4 or 5 years to pay down your debt and after that you are free from the debts.
Why is it so important to implement a limited period for bankruptcy?
1) Being bankrupt means you are also literally removing around 5-8% of the working public and 5-8% of households from participating in the real economy. Cannot do business, cannot get loans, even job hunting may be a problem every now and then.
2) The Malaysian archaic system overly favours the banks and financial lending institutions. When its in perpetuity, the banks can clamp down on you for the rest of your life. We have to make banks and other lenders also responsible for their part in giving out the loans. Look, even creditors to EU give haircut once Greece is in trouble. That is why banks in Malaysia can be so bloody aggressive with credit cards, they know they have a very long recourse to make your life a living hell.
3) The 250,000 figure (back in 2013, the present figure could be around 400,000) will jump soon. Why? Just look at the way they are dishing out the study loans under PTPTN. Look at the surge in personal loans by non bank institutions, look at the aggressive credit card schemes. When you give out RM30,000 or RM40,000 or RM50,000 to someone and their job is only likely to pay them RM2,000-2,500 when they graduate, if they graduate, and if they can find a job then, … you are going to have huge problems. Plus, we haven’t got to the credit card users yet.
4) Even people who end up in jail for a few years and come out, they are free … not if you are a bankrupt, man, they will drag you till you go to your grave.
5) The onus needs to shift back to the banks and other institutional lenders for a more balanced and equitable solution. For far too long have the banks been operating giddily under such a protective umbrella in their favour. There has to be a fairer distribution of risk for lending and borrowing. I am not suggesting that debtors need not pay, I am saying you need to give them a limited timeline.
6) When you take out 5-8% of the household from the real economy in perpetuity, it has a lot of indirect repercussions: cannot get study loans for children, making it very difficult to reverse their position as their job prospects may be affected as some companies frown on their status, etc. Needless to say, these 5-8% will also NOT play a part in the real economy in an effective manner – talk about dropping an anchor on the economy, it weighs heavily especially if its in perpetuity.











