Malaysian Jekyll and Hyde

20 Signs Your Partner Is Controlling

Unhealthy and dangerous patterns aren’t always obvious.

In my years as a psychologist and advice columnist, I’ve long since learned that stereotypes don’t apply when it comes to controlling partners. Toxic relationships can sneak up on almost anyone. And controlling behavior on the part of a partner knows no boundaries—people of any age, gendersexual orientation or socioeconomic status can be in controlling relationships, playing either role.
Many of us visualize a controlling partner as one who openly berates everyone in their path, is physically aggressive, or constantly makes overt threats or ultimatums. We picture the grumpy bully who belittles every server he or she encounters or commands their partner how to dress from head to toe. While those signs are indeed troubling, there are many additional signs that might show up quite differently.
In fact, some controlling partners are acting out of a sense of emotional fragility and heightened vulnerability, and may perhaps show traits of Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria. Controlling people use a whole arsenal of tools in order to dominate their partners—whether they or their partners realize what’s happening or not. Sometimes, the emotional manipulation is complex enough that the person who is being controlled actually believes that they themselves are the villain, or that they are extremely lucky that their controlling partner “puts up” with them. Whether controlling behavior leads to more severe emotional or physical abuse or not, it is not a healthy situation.
If you notice more than a couple of these signs within your relationship or your partner, take it seriously. (If you are concerned for your safety or want to learn more about possibly abusive relationship patterns, visit thehotline.org.)
1. Isolating you from friends and family. It may start subtly, but this is often a first step for a controlling person. Maybe they complain about how often you talk to your brother on the phone, or say they don’t like your best friend and don’t think you should hang out with her anymore. Or they try to turn you against anyone that you’re used to relying on for support besides them. Their goal is to strip you of your support network, and thus your strength—so that you will be less likely or able to stand up against them whenever they want to “win.”
2. Chronic criticism—even if it’s ‘small’ things. Criticism, like isolation, is also something that can start small. In fact, someone may try to convince themselves that their partner’s criticism of them is warranted, or that their partner is just trying to help them be a better person. Or they may try to rationalize it, saying that it’s not such a big deal that he or she doesn’t like the way they dress or speak or eat or decorate their house and that they shouldn’t take it personally. But ultimately, no matter how individually small a criticism seems, if it’s part of a constant dynamic within your relationship, it would be very tough to feel accepted, loved, or validated. If every little thing you do could use improvement in your partner’s eyes, then how are you being valued as a true equal, let alone loved unconditionally?
3. Veiled or overt threats, against you or them. Some people think that threats have to be physical in nature to be problematic. But threats of leaving, cutting off “privileges,” or even threats by the controlling person to harm herself or himself can be every bit as emotionally manipulative as the threat of physical violence. It is not unheard of for the partner being controlled to feel stuck in a relationship not out of fear that they themselves will be harmed, but that their partner may self-destruct or harm themselves if they were to leave. Other times, a person may be threatened with losing their home, access to their children, or financial support if they leave a controlling or abusive partner (or are left by them). Whether or not the threats are genuine, it is just another way for the controlling person to get what they want at the expense of their partner.
4. Making acceptance/caring/attraction conditional. “I love you so much more when you’re making those sales at work.” “I don’t feel like being intimate with you. But if you keep working out and lose a bit more weight, you’ll be more attractive to me.” “If you can’t even be bothered to make dinner, I don’t even know what I’m getting from this relationship.” “You’d be hot if only you spent more time on your hair.” “If you’d actually finished college, you’d have something to talk about with my friends and wouldn’t feel so left out.” Though some of these examples are more blatant than others, the message is the same: You, right now, are not good enough. It’s the common-denominator theme of many a controlling relationship.
5. An overactive scorecard. Healthy, stable relationships have a sense of reciprocity built into them. It’s inherent that you will look out for each other, and not bean-count every little time you do something to help the other out. If your partner always keeps tally of every last interaction within your relationship—whether to hold a grudge, demand a favor in return, or be patted on the back—it could very well be their way of having the upper hand. And it can be downright exhausting.
6. Using guilt as a tool. Many controlling people are skilled manipulators at making their partner’s own emotions work in the controlling person’s favor. If they can manipulate their partners into feeling a steady stream of guilt about everyday goings-on, then a lot of the controlling person’s work is done for them—their partners will gradually try to do whatever they can to not have to feel guilty. Often this means relenting and giving up power and their own dissenting opinion within the relationship, which plays right into the controlling person’s hands.
7. Creating a debt you’re beholden to. Controlling people may come on very strongly in the beginning with seemingly romantic gestures. But upon closer inspection, many of those gestures—extravagant gifts, expectations of serious commitment early on, taking you for luxurious meals or on adventurous outings, letting you have full use of their car or home when they’re not there—can be used to control you. Specifically, they create an expectation of you giving something in return, or a sense that you feel beholden to that person because of all they’ve given you. This can make it more emotionally and logistically difficult to escape when further warning bells go off.
8. Spying, snooping, or requiring constant disclosure. A controlling partner typically feels that they have the right to know more than they actually do. Whether they keep their snooping secret or openly demand that you must share everything with them, it is a violation of boundaries from the get-go. Perhaps he or she checks your phone, logs into your email, or constantly tracks your Internet history, and then justifies this by saying they’ve been burned before, have trust issues, or the old standard: “If you’re not doing anything wrong, then you shouldn’t mind showing me.” It’s a violation of your privacy, hand-in-hand with the unsettling message that they have no interest in trusting you and instead want to take on a police-like presence within your relationship.
9. Overactive jealousy, accusations, or paranoiaA partner’s jealousy can be flattering in the beginning; it can arguably be viewed as endearing, or a sign of how much they care or how attached they are. When it becomes more intense, however, it can be scary and possessive. A partner who views every interaction you have as being flirtatious, is suspicious or threatened by multiple people you come in contact with, or faults you for innocent interactions because they may be “leading someone on” may be insecure, anxious, competitive or even paranoid. Additionally, when this perspective becomes ingrained within your relationship, they very likely are attempting to be controlling as well.
10. Not respecting your need for time alone. It’s another way of sapping your strength: making you feel guilty for time you need on your own to recharge, or making you feel like you don’t love them enough when you perhaps need less time with them than they need with you. It is natural that two partners may not automatically have the exact same needs in terms of alone time, even if they are both extroverts (or introverts). In healthy relationships, communication about those needs leads to a workable compromise. In controlling ones, the person needing the alone time is made out to be a villain or denied the time altogether, taking away yet another way they can strengthen themselves.
11. Making you “earn” trust or other good treatment. Of course you will trust someone you’ve dated for five years more than you trust the person you’ve been seeing for a month. But some amount of trust should be assumed or inherent within the relationship. For instance, as mentioned, you shouldn’t always have to detail your whereabouts for every moment of every day, nor should your partner automatically have the right to access your email or texts or Internet search history. If trust or even civil treatment is viewed as something you need to work up to rather than the default setting of the relationship, the power dynamic in your relationship is off-kilter.
12. Presuming you’re guilty until proven innocent. Again, a controlling person is often very skilled at making you feel that you’ve done something wrong even before you realize what you did. You may walk in the door to find them already angry about something that they found, thought about, or decided in your absence. And they may keep “evidence” of your wrongdoing to a point that you may feel they’ve got a whole case against you—even if you don’t quite understand it. From where you put their favorite coffee mug to whether you had lunch with a coworker without them knowing, you will always be assumed to have had criminal motives. Why do they do this? To use it as justification for punishing you in some way, or preemptively trying to keep you from making that “error” again—to keep you acting in ways they want you to.
13. Getting you so tired of arguing that you’ll relent. While some controlling people like to exert their influence under the radar, many others are openly and chronically argumentative and embrace conflict when they can get it. This can be especially true when their partner is more passive and the controlling person is likely to triumph in every disagreement that comes up, just because the partner being controlled is more conflict-avoidant in nature or simply exhausted from the fighting that they’ve done. 
14. Making you feel belittled for long-held beliefs. Maybe it’s your faith or your politics. Maybe it’s cultural traditions or your view of human nature. It’s great when our partners can challenge us in interesting discussions and give us new ways of looking at the world. It is not great when they make you feel small, silly, or stupid, or they consistently try to change your mind about something important to you that you believe in. Openness to new experience is wonderful—but a controlling partner doesn’t see it as a two-way street, and only wants you to be and think more like they do.
15. Making you feel you don’t “measure up” or are unworthy of them. Whether by subtly making you feel less attractive than they are, constantly reinforcing their professional accomplishments as compared to yours, or even comparing you unfavorably to their exes, controlling people often want you to feel grateful that you are in a relationship with them. This creates a dynamic where you will be more willing to work harder and harder to keep them and make them happy—a dream for someone who wants to dominate a relationship.
16. Teasing or ridicule that has an uncomfortable undercurrent. Humor and even teasing can be a fundamental mode of interacting within many long-term relationships. The key aspect is whether it feels comfortable and loving to both parties. In many controlling relationships, emotional abuse can be thinly veiled as “I was just playing with you; you shouldn’t take it personally.” And in one fell swoop, not only does the original criticism stand, but now an additional criticism of you having the “wrong” reaction has been levied. And you’re basically being told that you don’t have a right to your own feelings—a classic move by controlling people everywhere.
17. Sexual interactions that feel upsetting afterwards. An abusive or controlling dynamic within a relationship can often make its way into the bedroom. Sometimes things feel wrong even in the moment, but other times it’s a pattern of feeling uncomfortable after the interaction. Either way, when you feel consistently unsettled about goings-on within your sexual realtionship, it’s a sign that something is wrong.
18. Inability or unwillingness to ever hear your point of view. You may notice that you are constantly interrupted, or that opinions you express are quickly dismissed or were never acknowledged in the first place. Perhaps the conversation is always so overwhelmingly dominated by your partner that you can’t remember the last time they asked you a meaningful question about how you were doing and actually listened to the answer. Think, too, of whether you’ve ever tried to give them feedback about how their behavior makes you feel—and whether they’ve actually been able to take it in, or whether they’ve dismissed it out of hand (or perhaps even blamed you for having an invalid opinion.)
19. Pressuring you toward unhealthy behaviors, like substance abuseUndermining your fitness goals, constantly tempting you with cigarettes when you’ve quit, not respecting your decision to only have one drink rather than three—these are all ways that controlling people can try to thwart your attempts to be a healthier (and stronger) person. Since controlling people thrive on weakening their partners, it’s a natural tool for them to use.
20. Thwarting your professional or educational goals by making you doubt yourself. Maybe you always assumed you would go to law school, but now your partner is making you feel your grades weren’t good enough to get in. Maybe you used to have a lot of drive to own your own business, but your partner tends to think of your ideas as silly and you find you’ve lost confidence to pursue them further. Often a controlling partner has a way of using you as a weapon against yourself, by planting seeds of doubt about whether you’re talented or smart or hard-working enough to make good things happen in your life. This is another way they can take away your autonomy, making you more beholden to them—and serving their purposes quite nicely.
Andrea Bonior Ph.D
Image result for images of emilia binti hanafi

Hello Kelantan, Hello Terengganu

SAUDI KATA TAK PUASA TAK DENDA, TAK HENTI NIAGA UNTUK SEMBAHYANG OK TAPI…………


No. 1  No more penalties for people who do not fast 

Peace and mercy of the Lord God be upon you; as per the royal decrees of HRH the Crown-Prince, the Defense Minister, and the vice-president of the ministerial cabinet – may the Lord God protect all of them – and the decision no. 2571 of the cabinet on 18th of Shabaan, 1440 A.H.,

no penalties are to be exacted on those who, in public or in secret, do not fast during the Holy Month of Ramadan

this comes within the framework of respecting human rights as per the Lord God’s divine commands in the Quran and as per the moralistic and humanistic values within the culture of our noble society and within the vision of 2030 A.D. for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to achieve more progress and prosperity; 

henceforth, all former decisions contrary to this decree will be annulled once this decree is applied. 

A copy of this decree is delivered to the head of the Saudi religious police. 

Signature: The Defense Minister Abdul-Aziz Ibn Saudi Ibn Nayef Ibn Abdul-Aziz


No. 2  Businesses no need to close for prayers

Saudi Arabia said it will allow some businesses to stay open 24 hours a day, an announcement that triggered puzzlement over whether it was ending rules that require shops to shut for the five daily prayers.

A cabinet decision on Tuesday permitted stores and restaurants to operate all day in exchange for paying a fee, according to the official Saudi Press Agency. The Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs will determine the charge, as well as which commercial activities will be affected, it said.

From OutSyed the Box

No children should watch their mother being beaten

MALAYSIA HAS TWO LAWS.
SYARIAH AND CIVIL COURT.

THE ELITES ARE MOSTLY ARROGANT AND SELF CENTERED.
THE ELITES USE THEIR POSITION, MONEY AND POWER TO GET DOGS TO DO THEIR DIRTY TASK.

Pornography may affect your life more than you think

Experts Weigh In On Why People Like To Film Themselves Having Sex.

These days, we are more into recording our experiences than living them. All you have to do is attend a concert, and you will see hundreds if not thousands of cameras raised, capturing the moment, with attendees choosing to see a performance through the screen versus with their own eyes. While we are out recording moments for the gram publicly, we are also recording our intimate moments privately. Now almost everyone has a smart phone, making it super easy to take video or photos of your partner during sex.

“More people are filming themselves having sex with their partner because it is fun,” sex and relationships expert at LoveHoney told Metro.  “Let’s face it, our whole lives are captured on our smart phones, so why not sex, too? Lots of couples get off on watching themselves afterwards on film and having sex again because they are so turned on. And if you are going to dress up in sexy outfits for a session, of course you are going to want footage of the action.”
But if you’re going to engage in some on-camera action, make sure you do it sober and with consent.
“It is not a good idea to get the cameras out with a new partner or someone you don’t trust completely,” Annabelle says.
“Who knows where the footage might end up? You just don’t know who they will be sharing it with. By all means film with someone you trust but on the strict agreement that you both delete the footage in the event of a split.”
Besides the excitement of recording and watching, another sex expert, Stu Nugget from Lelo, says people like to watch each other for self-involved reasons. Basically, it’s a sexual selfie.
“Perhaps we’re all narcissists at heart: we all want to see ourselves as sexual, and by filming ourselves, we can do that literally, over and over again,’ he tells Metro.co.uk. ‘But it’s not a new thing. It’s just masturbating in the mirror for the digital age. There’s something intensely intimate about self-eroticism, and there’s something inherently sexy about watching yourself having sex while you’re having sex. It’s all very meta,” he explained.

How can one boycott Non Muslim Goods with Pig Money?

MALAYSIA TODAY HAS TURNED INTO A TALIBAN NATION BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY ARE FILLED WITH DONKEY AND FOOLS.

THOSE WHO CLAIMED THEIR RELIGION IS THE TRUE ONE ARE DONKEY AND FOOLS.

THOSE WHO DO NOT READ THE QURAN ARE DONKEY AND FOOLS.

THOSE WHO READ BUT DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE QURAN ARE DONKEY AND FOOLS.

CAN THOSE DONKEY AND FOOLS NAME ONE COUNTRY THAT DOES NOT USE PIG MONEY TO SATISFY THEIR LUST,

SO WHY IS PIG MONEY OKAY BUT GOODS NOT OKAY, ANYONE??????

A time bomb about to explode

It is not everyday I come across a sick Millionaire who uses money and connection to do his dirty laundry.

This Millionaire can seek the help of the Police anytime, any day to threatened his so called enemies.
Can IGP Abdul Hamid Bador explain how PDRM has become a toy for this Millionaire?

Image result for images of IGP hamid bador

This Millionaire’s companies are into money laundering and double invoicing.
Can Latheefa Koya explain why MACC is not investigating this?
Image result for images of latheefa koya

Can Lim Guan Eng explain why this Millionaire is given special privileges such as not paying his taxes?
Image result for images of lim guan eng

Can Chief Justice Tengku Maimun explain her relationship with this Millionaire who allowed her Judges to follow this Millionaire’s instruction in all 20 cases?
Image result for images of chief justice of malaysia

Can Gobind Singh the Minister for MCMC explain why he takes instructions from this Millionaire?
Image result for images of gobind singh of mcmc

Is it true that this Millionaire is God Son to Mahathir?
Image result for images of mahathir cabinet

Can AG Tommy Thomas explain the claimed make by this Millionaire’s Lawyer that he can  KOW TIM WITH YOU?
Image result for Images of tommy thomas

Can Marina Mahathir explain how this Millionaire ensure SISTER OF ISLAM LOST THEIR CASE RECENTLY?
Image result for IMAGES OF MARINA MAHATHIR

Can someone from Istana explain how Agong can be close to this Millionaire personally.
Image result for images of agong

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) …
  • Chlamydia. …
  • Gonorrhea. …
  • Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) …
  • Genital Warts and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) …
  • Genital Herpes (HSV-1, HSV-2) …
  • Syphilis. …
INTERMITTENT EXPLOSIVE DISORDER
Intermittent explosive disorder involves repeated, sudden episodes of impulsive, aggressive, violent behavior or angry verbal outbursts in which you react grossly out of proportion to the situation. Road rage, domestic abuse, throwing or breaking objects, or other temper tantrums may be signs of intermittent explosive disorder.
These intermittent, explosive outbursts cause you significant distress, negatively impact your relationships, work and school, and they can have legal and financial consequences.
Intermittent explosive disorder is a chronic disorder that can continue for years, although the severity of outbursts may decrease with age. Treatment involves medications and psychotherapy to help you control your aggressive impulses.

Symptoms

Explosive eruptions occur suddenly, with little or no warning, and usually last less than 30 minutes. These episodes may occur frequently or be separated by weeks or months of nonaggression. Less severe verbal outbursts may occur in between episodes of physical aggression. You may be irritable, impulsive, aggressive or chronically angry most of the time.
Aggressive episodes may be preceded or accompanied by:
  • Rage
  • Irritability
  • Increased energy
  • Racing thoughts
  • Tingling
  • Tremors
  • Palpitations
  • Chest tightness
The explosive verbal and behavioral outbursts are out of proportion to the situation, with no thought to consequences, and can include:
  • Temper tantrums
  • Tirades
  • Heated arguments
  • Shouting
  • Slapping, shoving or pushing
  • Physical fights
  • Property damage
  • Threatening or assaulting people or animals
You may feel a sense of relief and tiredness after the episode. Later, you may feel remorse, regret or embarrassment.


Club drugs tend to be used by teenagers and young adults at bars, nightclubs, concerts, and parties. Club drugs include GHB, Rohypnol®, ketamine, MDMA (Ecstasy), Methamphetamine, and LSD (Acid).

THIS MILLIONAIRE IS A TIME BOMB WAITING TO DO MURDER.
AND THE PEOPLE HE KNOWS AND PAY FOR THEM TO DO HIS DIRTY TASK ARE MOVING INTO THAT DIRECTION.
THIS MILLIONAIRE MUST BE LOCKED UP FOR HIS OWN GOOD IN A HOSPITAL.
Murdered in Malaysia: The Altantuya Story by [E.S. Shankar]

Telekom Malaysia Rejuvenated?


For much of the last 2 years, pressure on broadband prices going lower were very strong. TM share price was in the doldrums below RM3.00 for the longest time but has since gapped up. Was it due to “good quarterly” figures?




Results:

Telekom Malaysia (TM) reported a net profit of RM114.2m in 2QFY19, +12% YoY on the back of lower operating, net finance and tax costs. An impairment amounting to RM124.6m was recognised in the current quarter following the announcement of price adjustment of its Streamyx services. This was not a surprise as the possibility of provision on its copper network assets. Stripping out impairment and other non operating items, normalised 1HFY19 net profit stood at RM523.2m, beating market forecasts at 60% and 70% of full-year estimates respectively. On a QoQ basis, normalised 2QFY19 net profit fell 23.5% on higher direct and manpower costs. 

Regulatory pressure on TM has subsided where further decline in broadband prices are unlikely going forward. TM aims to gradually phase out its expensive but slow speed Streamyx services, it could potentially incur higher cost and lose further broadband market share to competitors (note that the decline in Streamyx subscriber base is higher than the increase in Unifi base). Meanwhile, the Cabinet has recently approved the RM21.6bn national fiberisation and connectivity plan (NFCP) over a 5-year period beginning this year. This is expected to be utilised to part-finance the deployment of digital infrastructure, particularly in the underserved areas. 


The Rejuvenator

Looking at the price action, and the way EPF has been accumulating, it is likely to be NOT due to just earnings jump to explain the rise in interest. Rumour has it that TM has proposed to the government that it be allocated most of the radio spectrum at 700Mhz, 2300Mhz and 2600Mhz in order for it to be the sole provider of 5G infra.

There are a lot of naysayers who feel that TM may not be the best gatekeeper. I think that proposal may be a longshot at best, but market players seem to think otherwise. I would be guarded on that prospect.

APPEAL FOR FUNDS TO HELP EMILIA DEFENCE PAYMENTS

APPEAL FOR FUNDS TO HELP EMILIA DEFENCE PAYMENTS TO BE DEPOSITED INTO EMILIA’S MOTHER’S BANK ACCOUNT

Mazlipah @ Mazlifah binti MohdMaybank Account :  1627 6808 1077

Perintah mahkamah wajib dipatuhi. Walaupun aktiviti amal itu  sesuatu yang baik tapi ianya bukanlah suatu kewajipan seperti mematuhi perintah mahkamah. Hak pemohon untuk lawatan anak mesti dihormati dan kena patuhi perintah mahkamah mengenai hak lawatan anak.
Disebabkan aktiviti amal itu bukanlah satu kewajipan, maka Emilia telah melanggar perintah/penghakiman mahkamah. Malah pemohon sendiri tidak membenarkan pertukaran tarikh lawatan ke tarikh lain tersebut maka haknya untuk melawat anak anak telah dinafikan.

Mahathir, how many people became thieves when you are in power?

Ask him to count how many people became thieves when he was in power…….
I came across the above comment by CK in an article whose title I have long since forgotten. What I have not forgotten was what CK asked us to ask of Mahathir:
“ASK HIM TO COUNT HOW MANY PEOPLE BECAME THIEVES WHEN HE WAS IN POWER”…
Thief:
• Somebody who steals something especially with the
intention of escaping notice.
Steal:
• To take something that belongs to somebody else,
illegally or without the owner’s permission.
• To take or get something secretly or through trickery
• To take something that another person has created, and
present it as your own.
CK’s line captured the essence of the Mahathir’s time in government and identifies the main preoccupation that has defined UMNO and Barisan Nasional ever since.
In his person it can be argued that Mahathir was not corrupt while in office. He was not interested in amassing insane personal wealth. He did not suffer fools gladly and his work ethics were exemplary. One thing and one thing only coloured everything that he did – the acquisition of power within himself. In the acquisition of this power he was enormously successful and became blind to everything else.
Blind to the need of check and balances in the business of government. Blind to his duty as an elected representative to be responsible and accountable to the people for what he did. And he was certainly blind to what harm the wielding of that power did to our people and to our country – damage that irreversibly and irrefutably caused the breakdown of the very fabric of society that we have known for as long as we have lived.
There were the adverse economic costs that his irresponsible grandiose schemes, mega projects and Malaysia Inc. – all manifestation of his insistence to use the power within himself to do as he please unchecked – had costs our country. A cost that ran into the billions of ringgits. A debt to be paid back by us, our children and by many generations to come. In his self-absorbed pursuit of power Mahathir used everything at his disposal to acquire power and excused anything else to keep it.
The tender system used to purchase what our government required became the quintessential way by which so many of these newly acquired thieving skills of UMNO and Barisan Nasional were deftly honed upon. The tender system was skewered to serve Mahathir’s purposes via the politics of patronage. Those who served Mahathir and UMNO vested interest were rewarded with government contracts and projects. Tenders by invitation only, tenders by negotiations and ways and means were perfected to ensure its award were only to preferred parties as identified by those in power. The tender process became flawed to serve Mahathir’s and UMNO’s interest. And once this process was flawed it was abused at all levels.
Every process of the tender system became a way of making money for the enterprising government servant and others. From the time when a requirement was identified, to the tendering out process, to the evaluation of it and then to the purchase and its payment process, and if required its maintenance – all along the line money could and was made by those involved in the process – all at great costs to our country.
Thus started the thieving of our country resources by many government servants and politicians – and the culture of materialism was born. Now everything to be done in government had a price – from haggling with the policeman to ‘selesai’ a minor traffic infringement to the building of the RM$20 billion Putrajaya.
The more power he acquired the greater his ability to reward those who served his purpose – a vicious circled that preyed on the inherent greed of men. None can deny the power that Mahathir wielded was absolute. And in having that absolute power he corrupted the process of government absolutely.
The Sultans became thieves under Mahathir. They were rewarded by being allowed to continue with their useless and ostentatious life style at our expense if they did Mahathir’s bidding. They got something for doing nothing (is that not thieving?). If they dared to cross Mahathir, they were abuse and punished.
The Mentri Besar did Mahathir’s bidding and structured Cawangans, Bahagians and Negri level within UMNO into factions with leaders who only had loyalty to Mahathir and financial rewards came with it. We have yet to meet a Mentri Besar from the Mahathir era that retired poor! Ketua Bahagians and Negri were little Napoleons of the great wealth and unbridled power in as long as it served Mahathir’s purposes. One of the most memorable example of these thieves chosen personally by Mahathir to be Mentri Besar, is that dentist now convicted of corruption – Khir Toyo. All these thieves given respectability through politics under UMNO led by Mahathir!
Ministers were thieves for the many financial rewards they obtained for putting up with the Mahathir and his megalomaniac ways of doing government. They put up with everything that Mahathir wanted to do in Cabinet because in him they knew rested their career in politics and their financial rewards for services faithfully rendered to Mahathir. This was thieving on a grand scale with legitimacy conferred at the highest level in the land – the Cabinet.
When the highest echelons of government are themselves thieves – what more its people. And that is why I say that CK got the essence of Mahathir’s era when he said this of Mahathir’s time in government:
“Ask him to count how many people became thieves when he was in power”…
What a damming indictment of Mahathir who dares to think that he could be one of our greatest Prime Minister! Greatest my a@r*! He would be more at home amongst Field Marshal Idi Amin, Emperor Bokassa or Papa Doc of Haiti – all leaders diseased with the need to have power within themselves oblivious to the need of the people and the country they serve. All leaders dammed by history and considered buffoons when pitted against Ang Sang Sui Kyi and Mandela. Our tragedy is that we already have such a buffoon in Mahathir!
First posted by Hussein abdul Hamid on Tuesday, March 13, 2012
No photo description available.

Mahathir’s Halfway Leadership

Image result for images of how malay wrap dead body

Reflections On Merdeka Day: Mahathir’s Halfway Leadership

August 28th, 2019

Reflections On Merdeka Day:  Mahathir’s Halfway Leadership
M. Bakri Musa (www.bakrimusa.com)
During the polio epidemic of the 1950s, ingenious engineers created the iron lungs and saved many lives, while skillful surgeons crafted nifty operations and salvaged countless paralyzed limbs.
Those advancements, though impressive, were what physician Lewis Thomas referred to as halfway technology. True technology came when Salk and Sabin produced their vaccines. Halfway technology is not only expensive but also does not address the basic problem.
Likewise with leadership; there is the true version and then there are the many halfway varieties. Halfway leadership too does not solve problems; in fact it compounds them. It is also expensive both in terms of the direct damages inflicted as well as in the lost opportunities.
Malaysia was blessed with a few true leaders during her first half. Tengku Abdul Rahman inspired the multiracial population, hitherto (and still is) suspicious of each other, on a single pursuit – the country’s independence – and successfully negotiatedfor it. Thus the nation was spared its war of independence and Malaysians today are unabashed admirers of their former colonizers.
Economist Ungku Aziz leveraged the powerful religious aspiration of Hajj to make Malays save. In the process he ushered them into the modern economy, making Tabung Haji one of the region’s biggest financial institutions. Chief Justice Tun Suffian elevated the country’s judiciary to be the envy of the region.
During Malaysia’s second half, Mahathir’s leadership dominated, from 1981 until he retired in 2003. Then in May 2018, at 92, he toppled the ruling coalition that he once led. Its leader, Najib Razak, was Mahathir’s protégé and chosen successor. The irony!
A visitor today would be impressed on landing at Kuala Lumpur’s gleaming international airport. The smooth, undulating freeways into the city, beautifully landscaped, make you feel as if you are still in the First World. The glut of five-star hotels adds to that aura.
Impressive though those may be, they are but halfway developments, showy artifacts of modernity. They cannot hide the stark realities that often intrude, like hideous acnes through thick makeup. Malaysian schools and universities for example, are an embarrassment. Minister of Education Mahathir initiated the decline in the late 1970s. Later as Prime Minister, he greased the slide.
Mahathir was also instrumental in the state’s massive involvement in Islamic affairs. Today the religious bureaucracy exceeds the Papal one in budget, personnel, and most pernicious of all, power. While the Pope could only influenceCatholics, Malaysian state-employed ulama controlMalays, in activities as well as thoughts.
This huge and sinister religious serpent that Mahathir created is now striking back. Witness the current raging and unnecessary controversies over a radical, Indian-Muslim dropout physician-turned- preacher, and the introduction khat (Arabic calligraphy) in schools. Both do not contribute to the economy. On the contrary, they come in the way of improving it.
This huge Islamic beast sucks up precious resources that could have been used to tackle pressing social problems, like rampant drug abuse, uncontrolled HIV infections, and the epidemic of abandoned babies. Those appalling social pathologies disproportionately inflict Malays. In their pursuit of Heaven, those religious types believe in first making Muslims endure Hell on earth.
As for Tabung Haji, it had to be bailed out recently. For the judiciary, a high-profile attorney was once caught on videotape aggressively lobbying on the phone the then Chief Justice. Among that lawyer’s clients was Prime Minister Mahathir.
Mahathir tolerated corruption; a necessary lubricant for a creaky bureaucracy, he rationalized. That attitude, and the culture it nurtured, produced today’s unbridled venality, with former Prime Minister Najib and a dozen of his ministers and aides now facing criminal charges of corruption. Mahathir of course absolved himself of any responsibility.
Mahathir was and still is a halfway leader. He is ensnared by what the young Nigerian writer Chimamanda Adichie termed “the trap of a single story.” Mahathir’s self-fabricated sole narrative remains unchanged:  Malays are stupid and lazy; Chinese, wily and greedy.
Nor could Mahathir overcome that subtle and crippling Malay cultural trap of terhutang budi(debt of gratitude). His earlier support for Najib had nothing to do with the latter’s talent (Najib had none) but an expression of that old sentiment. In early 1970s Najib’s father, then Prime Minister Razak, resurrected Mahathir’s crumbling political prospects.
At 94, Mahathir has not much time. He ignores his most crucial assignment – to ensure a peaceful and predictable transition of power. He is back to his trademark destructive trait – fomenting unnecessary confusion and divisive uncertainty, especially with respect to his possible successor.
True leaders believe in their followers. When their initiatives fail, those leaders would reexamine them and formulate new ones, not blame their followers. Mahathir revels in stereotyping and blaming them.
In his book Robert Kuok, A Memoir, the author quoted Deng Xiaoping at their only meeting. “Mr. Kuok, they all say I am the one that is bringing this huge and rapid development in China. They are wrong. When I opened the door for China, they were all pushing me from behind. They are still pushing me.”
A variation on Lao Tzu’s theme – when a true leader’s work is done, the people would say, “We did it ourselves!”
What Deng did not reveal, as evident from Ezra Vogel’s biography of the man, was that there were many who opposed Deng’s opening of China. His wisdom was in notlistening to or heeding them. That’s true leadership, discerning and then encouraging the wise instincts in their followers, and ignoring those less blessed.
Mahathir panders to and exploits the raw emotions and base instincts of Malays. His championing Islam is not to emancipate Malays, as the Prophet did to the Bedouins of the 7thCentury, but as a political tool, and a very dangerous one. Likewise with Malay special privileges; Malays are fed the illusion of success and reflected glory with the opulence of their sultans and UMNO elite, their rent-seeking spoils sold as “entrepreneurial success.”
Mahathir Version 2 is no enhancement. He is still obsessed with iron lungs and weakened limbs. He does not see the need for a vaccine, much less work on one. Today’s slew of UMNO leaders indicted for corruption is only one malignant manifestation of Mahathir’s halfway leadership. His once much-hyped Vision 2020, is just that – hype. Not a word from him now. It was never a vision, only a slogan.
His last hurrah was in ejecting Najib and his Barisan coalition. Malaysians are grateful for that. That gratitude however, is not without bounds, and Mahathir is determined to breach that, thus betraying the trust Malaysians gave him in the last election. He is back to his old spiteful self, provoking controversies and then blaming others for stirring them up.
Mahathir wants to burden Malaysia with another Najib-caliber successor in Azmin Ali. Time to stop Mahathir. Besides, if he could not achieve his goals when he led the nation for 23 years and when he was much younger, there is little hope for him now that he is nearing 95. Time to disabuse the man of his Messiah delusion.
Mahathir should exit gracefully. Entice him with whatever it would take. Award him whatever title he craves and shower him with all the luxuries he desires. A lifetime corporate jet privilege and rent-free penthouse suite at his favorite Petronas Towers would be much cheaper than the damage he is inflicting and continues to inflict on Malaysia. If those do not work, not-so-gently remind him of the sorry fate that awaits the many Third World leaders who overstayed.
Malaysia deserves a true leader as she enters her 63rdyear of Merdeka.
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started